The large information in Bowtie land lately is Chevrolet Efficiency’s monster ZZ632 tall-deck big-block crate engine that may make 1,004 hp on 93 octane gasoline. All people is buzzed about four-digit usually aspirated horsepower on pump gasoline and this achievement is actually worthy of reward.
After finding out the specs, impressed by the torque curve, and marveling at how this engine makes 600 lb.-ft. of torque at simply 3,000 rpm, there’s actually a lot with which to be impressed. Since this engine is aimed on the road crowd, our first thought was, how nicely would this engine carry out on the drag strip in an actual road automobile? If you happen to’re going to speculate critical cash in an engine of this magnitude, you’re not going to stuff it in a inventory 1967 Camaro or a second era Nova except the automobile additionally sports activities some chassis work.
We determined to make use of a full-frame 1966 Chevelle that we all know nicely and theoretically swap this engine into the automobile and simulate what mixture of components it will take to push this automobile as shortly as potential down the monitor. For our drag strip simulator software program, we selected an older program known as Quarter, Professional initially designed by Patrick Hale. There are different drag strip simulators comparable to Desk Prime Drag Race Simulator, and others however we’re probably the most aware of our Quarter, Professional software program in order that’s what we’ll use.
Working the ZZ632 on a Drag Race Simulator
We began with a Chevelle with small tires and can work our manner as much as its quickest potential mixture of huge tires, diminished weight, and optimized suspension and see simply how fast this huge Rat can push a ‘60s muscle automobile down the monitor. Proper out of the gate, weight and horsepower dictate this automobile ought to run within the 9s—however life on the strip is extra than simply huge horsepower.
Our theoretical Chevelle begins with 26 inch tall by 8 inch extensive DOT authorized sticky M/T tires, a TH400 trans with a 3,600 rpm stall velocity converter and a set of three.55:1 rear gears. We determined to shift this huge block at a conservative 6,500 rpm. A 12-bolt rear axle meeting may maintain up, however with all this torque a Unusual S-60 rear with a 9.5 inch diameter ring gear might be a greater concept.
We additionally selected to place our Chevelle at a preventing weight of three,700 kilos that features the motive force and a half-tank of gasoline. That may sound heavy, however our actual world Chevelle with an iron block LS motor and TH400 suggestions the size at 3,575 kilos with a number of light-weight components together with fiberglass hood, deck lid, no again seat, race seats, no heater field, and an eight-point roll bar. A tall deck, iron block 632ci Rat would add a minimal of 100 kilos so we rounded as much as 3,700 kilos to account for a bigger, heavier a 4L80E overdrive trans that might be a pure complement for this engine.
We’ve assembled all of the mixtures in an accompanying chart on the backside of this publish to make the outcomes simpler to check. Mixture A just isn’t sensible should you’re thinking about working shortly down the drag strip as a result of these little 8-inch extensive tires are merely over-powered. As you’ll be able to see from the three second 60 foot time, traction is significantly missing. The tires spin principally via second gear earlier than lastly gaining traction in excessive gear. The automobile nonetheless runs an incredible 141.5 mph within the quarter-mile, which reveals its energy. So we have to add greater tires and a looser converter.
We are going to save the educated racers the difficulty of deluging us with poison e-mail rants about managing traction. This simulation assumes planting all the facility proper off the beginning line. We’re conscious of the a number of methods to handle energy to permit a small tire automobile to speed up with minimal traction. MSD’s slew charge ignition field is one method to management energy together with a number of traction management packages that work extraordinarily nicely. This may very well be simply be handled by decreasing timing at decrease engine speeds to handle traction however then why put money into an engine making all this energy solely to not use it?
Making Changes to Our Digital Chevelle
For Mixture B of our take a look at, we added a 4,000 rpm stall velocity converter and likewise tubbed the Chevelle to permit putting in a set of 31 inch tall Mickey Thompson slicks which are 12.5 inches extensive. It’s clear this engine would require a tire this measurement or bigger to generate the traction we’ll want to put down all this energy. We additionally added a 4.10:1 rear gear to compensate for the efficient discount in gear ratio with the taller tire.
This B combo immediately produced some wonderful outcomes for a 3,700 pound automobile by pulling the 60 foot instances all the way down to 1.44 seconds with 1 / 4 mile move of 9.54 at 145.70 mph. We additionally added an honest traction floor roughly equal to a bracket race evening on the drag strip. This mid 9 second move additionally emphasizes that this quickness have to be accompanied by a number of security elements.
As soon as a automobile runs faster than ten flat, NHRA requires a major checklist of security modifications beginning with a full roll cage and the chassis should be licensed. Subsequent, you’ll want an SFI spec flexplate, a converter defend, a locking computerized dip stick tube, and different gadgets together with a contest license and a SFI rated hearth go well with for the motive force. Preserve these in thoughts in case you are contemplating including this sort of energy because it doesn’t make sense to construct a automobile that may run this fast that can solely get you tossed out after your first move for not having the right security gear.
Assuming your automobile will move tech, we’ve now reached the purpose the place the legislation of diminishing returns is totally at play. Working within the low 9s is fast so now we’re all the way down to smaller modifications to trim tenths from our heavy Chevelle. By bumping the stall velocity as much as round 5,000 rpm in Combo C, the 60 foot time truly slowed down by 0.01 second by spinning the tires tougher on the beginning however the looser converter did assist the 1/8-mile time by 0.13 second and the general ET by almost 0.20 second. A converter like that is going to push this automobile extra into the world of a race automobile and can be far much less enjoyable on the road as a consequence of its looser stall velocity.
We’re now deep into the 9s with a 3,700 pound automobile however there are nonetheless some little methods we are able to attempt. Let’s say we actually need to plant all the facility to the bottom. One of the best ways to do that is for Combo D to up the tire ante to 13 inch extensive M/T tires and we’ll do this at a neighborhood NHRA Divisional race the place the floor shall be higher. This helps with a 0.07 second enchancment in 60 foot instances that equates to a 9.23 at 147.9 mph.
With this a lot gear, this spins the motor to round 6,700 to six,800 rpm going via the lights which is nearly good since this ZZ632 makes peak energy at 6,600 rpm. This implies we are able to’t actually pull rear gear ratio however we may attempt decreasing the First gear ratio to see what that accomplishes. This appeared like a good suggestion for Combo E because the simulation revealed even our huge 13 inch tires had been spinning via the primary 30 ft off the road. This small ratio change pushed our simulated Chevelle to an attractive 9.20 at 148 mph and for the primary time the simulation confirmed as a lot as a 1.50 G throughout the first 60 ft. That might be a rush.
We had been shut sufficient to push this beast into the 8s. The simplest manner to try this is to simply trim the fats. With a number of experiments, we found that if we diminished the load to three,425 kilos—275 kilos lighter—this might push our huge beast to a 1.35 60 foot and a call-your-momma 8.98 at 151.3 mph blast.
We have now some expertise with Chevelles at 150-plus mph and we are able to let you know that these automobiles wish to fly at this velocity, lifting the entrance finish and making them a handful to maintain straight. Chevelle aerodynamics are atrocious with a definite lack of stability.
How A couple of Camaro As an alternative?
As a result of our pc simulation permits us to experiment with just some key strokes, we shifted our physique model to a fourth era Camaro on the identical weight in order that now we’re punching a a lot smaller and cleaner gap within the air. We diminished the Chevelle’s frontal space of 24 sq. ft to a barely smaller 22 sq. ft. The large change was decreasing the drag coefficient from 0.5 to 0.24. If we multiply frontal space instances drag coefficient, this creates one thing known as drag space. For comparability, the Chevelle’s drag space is 12 whereas the Camaro on this trim is 5.28—lower than half of the Chevelle.
All this paid off with an final time of 8.84 at 157.4 mph. So with a cleaner physique model at 3,425 kilos, this off-the-shelf 632ci Rat motor on pump gasoline motor clearly has the grunt to make even a heavy automobile very fast. Making the facility with this spectacular engine is straightforward.
So clearly the Chevy Efficiency ZZ632 is able to pushing even a heavy automobile deep in to the 9s with no bother. As you’ll be able to see from this easy simulation, the actual problem is hooking all that energy to the bottom.
However something this fast is actually definitely worth the effort!
|Combo||60 Ft.||660 Ft.||MPH||1,320 Ft.||MPH|
|A) Small Tire Avenue||3.06||8.46||109.6||11.99||141.5|
|B) 31×12.5 Tire
|C) 5,000 RPM Stall||1.45||6.01||117.1||9.35||147.5|
|D) 13×31 Tire, Monitor Prep||1.38||5.90||117.7||9.23||147.9|
|E) 1.91 First Gear||1.37||5.87||117.9||9.20||148.0|
|F) Weight to three,425 lbs.||1.35||5.74||120.8||8.98||151.3|
|G) Gen. IV Camaro||1.35||5.69||123.4||8.84||157.4|
How Fast is That?
One method to consider your mixture is to make use of a basic math equation that’s merely an estimate of common acceleration. To do that, all we’ve to do is divide the quarter-mile distance of 1,320 ft by the automobile’s entice velocity. It will give us a detailed approximation of the elapsed time for the velocity. For mixture A, the 141.5 mph divided into 1,320 leads to a 9.32 second ET, which is a much better quantity than our traction-limited 11.99. Conversely, if we use our greatest Chevelle simulation of 8.98 at 151.3 mph, the equation produces 1320/151.3 = 8.72—which isn’t unhealthy at solely 0.26 second faster than what the simulation estimated.
You are able to do your individual evaluations on the simulations that curiosity you in between these two extremes, however this easy take a look at is a fast method to decide simply how environment friendly the automobile is accelerating with any engine.
Chevy Efficiency ZZ632 Simulation Components Checklist